You can set up transport map entries FOR SPECIFIC EMAIL ADDRESSES
not just domain names.

        Wietse

hellfireroyle.com:
> hmmm, I've gone over the text you mentioned but I can't put together a
> solution. I believe my problem would be solved if I could manage to get the
> same functionality of "domain.com | smtp:mailhost.domain.com" from the
> transport mapping to work inside the virtual system. ie - domain.com |
> virtual in my transport map and "domain.com | smtp:mailhost.domain.com" as 1
> entry in my virtual table.
>
> The postfix man page for virtual indicate that specific takes precidence
> over such an entry so user1domain.com would be routed internall as it
> should with anything else being shunted off to the next host indicated.
>
> -tjh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wietseporcupine.org [mailto:wietseporcupine.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:57 AM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Selective Virtual Delivery
>
>
> The Postfix 2.0 transport map will let you send mail for specific address to
> a non-default delivery transport, but you could also use the virtual alias
> map (see FAQ: delivering some users locally).
>
> Wietse
>
> hellfireroyle.com:
> > I am looking for a way to implement the following -
> >
> > smtp1 -> pop1 -> internal Exchange server
> > smtp2 -> "
> >
> > The 2 smtp servers out front would be configured to accept and relay
> > mail for the domains I need in to the pop box, handled via a standard
> > transport map. This pop box would be configured to direct all the mail
> > that is bound for the internal Exchange server inward to it. I have a
> > small test setup of this config working now.
> >
> > The last piece of the puzzle is how could I (if possible) get the pop
> > box to
> > *hold* certain mail that is bound for the internal Exchange server? At the
> > moment I can get it to do one or the other - deliver locally or pass. By
> > default I would want all mail to be passed in, excluding the 2 dozen or so
> > addresses that I need to maintain the pop access for. It seems like this
> > should be a trivial configuration, but after a week of googling and
> > searching the list archives I have yet to make forward progress.
> >
> > Any pointers would be appreciated.
> >
> > -tjh
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]