|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: McAffee vs Sophos
From: Max Clark (max
clarksys.com)
Date: Tue Apr 01 2003 - 17:37:08 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm assuming that you are using the smtp daemonized version of vexira,
for ppl looking to get into this low cost could you shed some light on
the differences between the workgroup and server command line version?
Thanks,
Max
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-postfix-users
postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-users
postfix.org] On Behalf Of Graham Hillstomer
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Vivek Khera
Cc: postfix-users
postfix.org
Subject: Re: McAffee vs Sophos
Hi!
Over the years we have used a lot of different products and some we
built ourselves. I can only tell you on what we use now and why we use
it. We still have and maintain a test lab with many different products
and we test them when they release new versions hoping to find something
even better.
The only product that we have found that can handle huge amounts of mail
effortlessly with little to no problems is Vexira. It has proven to be
*extremely reliable* and cost effective and support is top notch. Sure
you can piece together your own solution but from a commerical
stand-point Vexira is the best for us.
We used to spend 40-60 hours a week maintaining email av across our
customer sites. Then we wrote some monitoring software so we could watch
what was happening more close and reduced it to 20 hours a week but we
never could get below 20 hours since always something would break. It
was envitable for us. A file would cause the virus scanner to peg the
CPU at 100%, it would stop updating for no reason, a file would crash
the scanner, you name it I have dealt with it. The av scanner or some
3rd party app used the av scanner would have a memory leak and cause
problems.
Now with Vexira we expense around 5 min. a week and that is just to look
at some correlated log reports showing when the last updates were
performed, history of av up times, and total viruses stopped so we can
prove that the av is working. I just glace at the reports making sure
that all is fine.
Because of this reliablity we have repurposed our av staff people to
other tasks and now we have just 3 people doing it for 24/7 support, we
used to have 9. I think that says a lot.
Graham
GH> For us in what we do we need more enterprise-class antivirus
GH> services that don't need this much attention.
What then might you recommend? Or have you developed some proprietary
scalable solution you use in house?
--
---
Graham Hillstomer II
Senior System Admin *BSD, HP-UX, Solaris
Quality of Service Response Team
Antivirus Solution Manager / SPAM Control Team Assistant
ghillstomer
postmaster.co.uk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]