From: adi (adimdgr.padinet.com)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2003 - 16:59:05 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:03:05PM -0400, Michael Breton wrote:
> If we had an option like soft_reject_rbl_client, we could run some rbls like
> spamcop that we don't trust completely.
>
> Of course there would have to be a soft_reject_rhsbl_sender option as
> well... :-)

It won't be necessary, postfix already has $rbl_reply_maps.
e.g:

main.cf:
rbl_reply_maps = hash:$config_directory/rbl_reply

rbl_reply:
any.rbl.domain $rbl_code Service unavailable; $rbl_class [$rbl_what] blocked using $rbl_domain${rbl_reason?; $rbl_reason}

change $rbl_code to 450 as you would.

if any.rbl.domain is not fould on rbl_reply_maps, then postfix
would happily use $default_rbl_reply.

Regards,

P.Y. Adi Prasaja

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]