|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
(fwd) Soft rlimit preferred to hard
From: LaMont Jones (lamont
hp.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 12:39:57 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Forwarded for a Debian developer not on the list. Please cc him on
replies.
lamont
-- forwarded message --
Subject: Soft rlimit preferred to hard
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:26:18 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company
Lines: 55
Sender: lamont
cranston.fc.hp.com
Message-ID: <20030421172244.GA4127
terpstra.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Cc: lamont
debian.org
To: postfix-users
postfix.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030314-p1 (Debian)
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greetings!
I recently discovered that postfix implements mailbox quotas with an rlimit.
First off, let me say, I think this is a good idea since child processes
can't accidentally stray over the limit during procmail, etc.
However, I think this limit is enforced too stringently.
Of particular interest to me is being able to access a database during the
delivery rule of a procmail filter. If a delivery rule opens the database to
do some processing, it will die with SIGXFSZ even though the mailbox limit
is observed. This is because a RLIMIT_FSIZE applies to all files and uses.
I believe that filesystem-level quotas are what should enforce a 'hard' disk
quota. Thus, I would prefer:
- rlim.rlim_cur =3D rlim.rlim_max =3D limit;
+ rlim.rlim_cur =3D limit;
Then, applications which really know they should be avoiding postfix's
rlimit could still operate inside it.
I understand that root can change this limit, but as a user, there is little
one can do. This is the position I find myself in.
Please remove the hard limit, but leave the soft, and I think postfix will
be more widely useful under more arcane mail configurations.
Thank you.
PS. I am not subscribed to this list, so please CC me.
--=20
Wesley W. Terpstra <wesley
terpstra.ca>
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+pCjjvLvElXGKklYRAtBtAJ95xZY74CHLAowM6pdNhxI7ogim1gCfZQEL
c3tljANOv6fZqKZjCPHgbTU=
=ttST
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DocE+STaALJfprDB--
-- end of forwarded message --
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]