From: adi (adimdgr.padinet.com)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 13:22:33 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:18:39PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> What were the incoming/active numbers again, and how does this
> compare to the qmgr_active_mumble limits?

I could not provide any data for now, as the number of queued
mail is zero :-)

You're right, the number of concurrent incoming connections
is does matter. I decided to use another idle HD, throwing
one more ip address and put another postfix instance on
that machine. If it is still not enough, we should have
any problem tomorrow.

> If the active numbers are stable and not approaching the limit,
> then mail is leaving postfix faster than that qmgr can find new
> work in the queue.

unfortunately, I have to change several variables on my main.cf
(change inet_interfaces etc). then, today, basically moving queued
mails from incoming to active keeps my postfix busy :-)
it's a shame really.

> What's the hash_queue_depth setting? The old setting of 2 is good
> for worst-case scenarios but normally costs a bit of performance.

I use hash_queue_depth = 2. do you think that change it to 1 or
even 0 would help?

Regards,

P.Y. Adi Prasaja

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]