From: Magnus Bäck (magnusdsek.lth.se)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 08:23:48 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 03:09:09PM +0200,
     Lukas Ruf <rufrawip.org> wrote:

> * Magnus B?ck <magnusdsek.lth.se> [2003-05-01 15:06]:
>
> > (1) and (2) are valid.
>
> why?

Because that's what aliases(5) says.

> I created a testing aliases while waiting for the answer with a
> version
>
> alias4:
> value9
> valueA
> valueB
>
> At least with postfix 1.x, it was working perfect.

What is the point? Why not just stick to the documented behaviour?

> But to be sure, I would like to kindly ask one of the "gurus" if all
> variants are valid -- I am not allowed to exclude recipients of emails
> my employer sends....

I don't follow you.

--
Magnus Bäck
magnusdsek.lth.se

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]