From: Lukas Ruf (rufrawip.org)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 08:41:59 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Magnus B?ck <magnusdsek.lth.se> [2003-05-01 15:24]:
> On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 03:09:09PM +0200,
> Lukas Ruf <rufrawip.org> wrote:
>
> > * Magnus B?ck <magnusdsek.lth.se> [2003-05-01 15:06]:
> >
> > > (1) and (2) are valid.
> >
> > why?
>
> Because that's what aliases(5) says.
>
However, aliases(5) does not say anything for (3) and (4).

> > I created a testing aliases while waiting for the answer with a
> > version
> >
> > alias4:
> > value9
> > valueA
> > valueB
> >
> > At least with postfix 1.x, it was working perfect.
>
> What is the point? Why not just stick to the documented behaviour?
>
I prefer this "layout". Referring to main.cf, there (1)-(4) are
allowed explicitely. Comparing with alias-based mailing lists, I'd
prefer (4) too.

Thanks anyway!

wbr,
Lukas
--
Lukas Ruf | Wanna know anything about raw |
<http://www.lpr.ch> | IP? <http://www.rawip.org> |

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]