From: Kim Emax (postfixemax.dk)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 05:18:53 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---- Original Message ----
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <Ralf.Hildebrandtcharite.de>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:19 PM

> PCRE will be faster, and I guess your checks can be optimized.

They´re very simple, for example:

/^Subject: .*E-a-r-n.*/ REJECT No spam allowed (H8)

/.*( N-BC| C-BS| C-NN| Oprah).*/ REJECT No spam allowed (B5)

(I´ve put - in the checks so my mailserver won´t reject my own mail :o)

But I have problems using pcre instead:

Jun 23 15:00:15 server postfix/cleanup[30450]: fatal: unsupported dictionary
type: pcre
Jun 23 15:00:16 server postfix/master[1323]: warning: process
/usr/libexec/postfix/cleanup pid 30450 exit status 1
Jun 23 15:00:16 server postfix/master[1323]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/cleanup: bad command startup -- throttling

when using pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks ? Isn´t the above correct for
Perl RegEx?, I would think so...

--
Take Care
Kim Emax - Freelance programmør
http://www.emax.dk - http://www.ayianapa.dk
Køb din vin online på http://www.gmvin.dk,
Danmarks måske mest avancerede VinWebShop

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]