From: Simon Matthews (simonpaxonet.com)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 19:09:00 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Wietse Venema wrote:

> Simon Matthews:
> > > > I have also noticed that the transport map does not always override the
> > > > default message delivery method. I had a working Postfix 1.x
> > > > configuration, in which I had specified the doamins for which I wanted to
> > > > accept mail in the "mydestination" parameter and then specified that all
> > > > email for these domains should be relayed to another machine via the
> > > > transport map. This may not be the correct way to do this, but according
> > > > to the documentation on the "Mail transport switch" it should
> > > > work, and it did with Postfix 1.x.
> > > >
> > > > When I upgraded to 2.x, I observed that this worked ONLY for users that
> > > > either had a local login or had a matching entry in the virtual_users
> > > > table. Removing the domains from "mydestination" and adding them to
> > > > "relay_domains" fixed the problem.
> > >
> > > What was the exact error message?
> >
> > It was:
> > "User unknown in local recipient table"
>
> That has nothing to do with transport maps, and everything to do
> with the information that you can find in LOCAL_RECIPIENT_README
> and in ADDRESS_CLASS_README.

Wietse,

Once again, thanks for clarifying this. Just a minor additional point: the
emails were rejected with a 550 code, not 450 as the document suggests.

simon

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]