|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Client host [127.0.0.1] blocked
From: Kenneth Loafman (ken
lt.com)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 10:34:11 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kabagambe Kenneth wrote:
>>>>Action: failed
>>>>Status: 5.0.0
>>>>Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 554 5.1.0 Service
>>>> unavailable; Client host [127.0.0.1] blocked using bl.spamcop.net;
>>>>Blocked
>>>> - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?127.0.0.1 (in reply to end of DATA
>>>> command)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I have these in my main.cf
>>>
>>>mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.1.0/24, 62.128.174.0/24, 64.152.195.0/24, 193.219.212.0/24
>>>
>>>smtpd_client_restrictions =
>>>
>>>smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
>>> permit_mx_backup,
>>> regexp:/etc/postfix/regexp.cf,
>>> reject_unauth_destination,
>>> reject_invalid_hostname,
>>> reject_unauth_pipelining,
>>> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
>>> reject_unknown_sender_domain,
>>> reject_multi_recipient_bounce,
>>> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
>>> reject_multi_recipient_bounce,
>>> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
>>> reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
>>> reject_rhsbl_client blackhole.securitysage.com,
>>> reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org,
>>> reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
>>> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
>>> reject_rbl_client blackholes.wirehub.net
>>>
>>>Is there someone who manages the spamcop.net here? Other rbls are working fine.
>>
>>
>>Not me, but I do follow the SC newsgroups. There's been a bit of
>>discussion about that and it has been fixed as of about 9am CST.
>>
>>It looks to me like Postfix should not have been checking it anyway, so
>>I'm interested in that answer more than SC's.
>>
>>...Ken
>>
>>
>
>
> You mean that reject_rbl should be checking it since I listed it in mynetworks? Thats what I thought.
> The guys at spamcop have fixed it.
> http://news.spamcop.net/pipermail/spamcop-list/2003-December/065855.html
> Thanks
>
> kenneth
>
As I understand it, the permit_mynetworks should have caused Postfix to
bypass the other checks. The reject_rbl_client should not be involved.
...Ken
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]