From: Alex van den Bogaerdt (alexergens.op.het.net)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2004 - 15:34:28 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:25:45PM -0800, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> > Forwarding could be done in an entirely different way. For instance,
> > the original message could be attached to a new message (originating
> > from the forwarder) to the final destination.
>
> So: break what works, and create a user-ugly message format, to solve a
> problem you just created yourself.

It doesn't work. The originating domain doesn't want it to work. That's
why they announced the policy as they did. The domain being handed the
forwarded message also doesn't want it to work. That's why they
reject the message.

Secondly, noone prevents you from building functionality that encapsulates
a message being forwarded in such a manner that the receiving party
will recognize it as such and decapsulates it again.

Start by working _with_ the good guys in stead of against them. You
sound like a spammer.

Anyway, this is way OT for an MTA list. Please move this discussion
to the SPF list.

Alex
--
begin sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]