|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: SPF is fundamentally broken
From: Alex van den Bogaerdt (alex
ergens.op.het.net)
Date: Wed Jan 14 2004 - 05:09:31 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:02:43PM -0500, Max Paperno wrote:
> At 1/12/2004 05:04 PM +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
>
> >What is wrong with taking the letter out of the envelope, putting it
> >in another envelope and forward it using _your_own_ envelope?
> >This, or alternatively, putting the entire package including the
> >original envelope in another envelope.
>
> Well first of all it's more work than necessary, but the ultimate issue
> is that it makes YOU responsible for the mail now. If it's undeliverable,
> YOU are responsible for the mail, which is going to cost you one way or
> another. A simple forwarding service turns into a process-intensive
> task with possible liability issues. No thanks.
So, if you decide to forward your incoming mail to another place,
and if you make a mistake in doing so, _I_ should be responsible?
No thanks.
Alex
--
begin sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]