From: Alex van den Bogaerdt (alexergens.op.het.net)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 10:16:04 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:30:08PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:02:22AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > And therefore the solution to spam is to f..k up the infrastructure
> > > with measures that have no long term impact on spam.
> >
> > Proof, please.
>
> See my message <20040115150358.E32740bofh.enst.fr> about aliases
> forwarding, the stuff that you call "lying". I consider that a proof
> that SPF proponents need a reality check.

That is no proof, that is an opinion.

So, we disagree. Moreover, you disagree with both A and C in that
same message. I fail to see how your opinion should be of more
value than the opinion of both A and C.

You used to be able to enforce your reality onto A and C, SPF is
giving control back to A and C.

Alex
--
begin sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]