|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: Postfix 2.0.19 problem
From: Aladdin (aladdin
antakalnis.lt)
Date: Sat Apr 03 2004 - 11:25:30 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I read main.cf. But as I said with 550 code all log activity almost stoped
but with 450 logs were huge and were growing fast. So I think that 550 was
the solution for this. I'll try to do hello checks. But 550 code woks just
fine for this:)
>>> I found one solution in the archives:) By default there was 450 reject
>>> code which means "try again later":) I tried to change this code to
>>> 550. Results were - logs grow much slower:) But, I think, I must wait
>>> for one day ar two to be able to see final results of this. Because I
>>> had 450 reject code almost one week turned on.
>>>
>>
>>As has been said before here (and is said in main.cf) - think carefully
>>before changing 450 to 550. I prefer to use access or helo checks to
>>refuse mail from known spam sources. It means periodically checking the
>>logfiles but you should do that anyway.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]