OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Re: From Email Address

From: Adam G Velegol (agvelegolaep.com)
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:55:53 CDT


Strange,

Here are my headers:

Received: from mail3.aep.com ([10.127.174.208])
          by dsml1cc.aepsc.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11)
          with SMTP id 2004042111284394:12466 ;
          Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:28:43 -0500
Received: from mail3.aep.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
                 by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898271BE
                 for <agvelegolaep.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:28:43 -0500
(CDT)
Received: from elwood.jpl.local (h57d17.delphi.afb.lu.se
                 [130.235.189.155])by mail3.aep.com (Postfix) with SMTP id
EE3944EEfor
                 <agvelegolaep.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:28:42 -0500
(CDT)
Received: from jeeves.jpl.local (jeeves.jpl.local [192.168.7.3])by
                 elwood.jpl.local (Postfix) with ESMTPid 1E3CCBD; Wed, 21
Apr 2004 18:28:39
                 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by jeeves.jpl.local (Postfix, from userid 100)id D4D2F3C5A; Wed,
                 21 Apr 2004 18:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:28:38 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Magnus_B=E4ck_ <magnusdsek=2Elth=2Ese.aep.com>,
                 ?=mail3.aep.com
To: Adam G Velegol <agvelegolaep.com>,
                 agvelegolorpmail.com
Subject: Re: Postfix Mailing List
Message-ID: <20040421162838.GX25456jeeves.jpl.local>
References:
<OF447BB623.AE00733D-ON85256E7D.0051C4C2-85256E7D.0051F31Baepsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To:
<OF447BB623.AE00733D-ON85256E7D.0051C4C2-85256E7D.0051F31Baepsc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Console-Location: Home
X-imss-version: 2.5
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:15 M:2 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:4 C:3 M:4 S:4 R:4 (1.0000 1.0000)
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on DSML1CC/SERVERS/AEPIN(Release
5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at
 04/21/2004 11:28:43 AM,
                 Serialize by Notes Client on Adam G Velegol/AEPIN(Release
6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at
 04/21/2004 12:53:20 PM,
                 Serialize complete at 04/21/2004 12:53:20 PM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
                 charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

Adam Velegol
American Electric Power
Message Systems
IT System Administrator II
Voice: 614.716.3146
E-mail: agvelegolaep.com

Sascha Siekmann/S-C <Sascha.Siekmannscon.de>
Sent by: owner-postfix-userspostfix.org
04/21/2004 10:09 AM

To
postfix-userspostfix.org
cc

Subject
Re: From Email Address

Hi,

this has nothing to do with postfix and all with Lotus Notes, you need to
look at your SMTP configuration on your Notes server. Open the
configuration document and check:
Inbound Conversion Options

Use character set auto-detection if message has no character set
information:
Yes

If you are using 6.5.1. as a standalone POP3 client, forget what I said.

Mit freundlichem Gruß,

Sascha Siekmann.

http://spam-exitus.de

Adam G Velegol <agvelegolaep.com>
Sent by: owner-postfix-userspostfix.org
04/21/2004 15:43

To
postfix-userspostfix.org
cc

Subject
From Email Address

Messages coming in to my system from Magus Back are showing "
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Magnus_B=E4ck_ <magnusdsek=2Elth=2Ese.aep.com>;
mail3.aep.com" as the From address.
I'm looking for information on why this would occur and where I need to
start looking. I've also seen many
"undisclosed-recipients:"mail3.aep.com.

If more information is needed, please let me know.

Thanks,

Adam Velegol

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Magnus_B=E4ck_ <magnusdsek=2Elth=2Ese.aep.com>;
mail3.aep.com
Sent by: owner-postfix-userspostfix.org
04/21/2004 09:18 AM

Please respond to
postfix-userspostfix.org

To
postfix-userspostfix.org
cc

Subject
Re: SPAM filters

On Wednesday, April 21, 2004 at 15:06 CEST,
  Ignacio Vidal <ividalbiycsa.com.ar> wrote:

> > completely pointless. Drop smtpd_sender_restrictions. Also, reorder
> > the RBLs so that lists that block more mail are placed earlier. For
> > example, SpamCop will block more than ORDB.
>
> Just a question: where can I get a "ranking" for ordb's?

I know of no such ranking, but you can get clues from you own log files.
Also, examine the list archives and the listing policy for the RBLs.

--
Magnus Bäck
magnusdsek.lth.se