Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com
Date: Mon May 03 2004 - 16:48:40 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 3 May 2004, Ben Rosengart wrote:

> In other words, unless the OS or the underlying storage is lying to
> Postfix with the return of fsync(), I have nothing to worry about,
> is that what you're saying?
>
> DESCRIPTION
> fsync() causes all modified data and attributes of fd to be
> moved to a permanent storage device.
>
> My understanding is that NFS preserves this guarantee. So, good.
>

NFS the specification preserves the guarantee, NFS the implementation
might not. Look in your logs to determine how the queue ids in question
came into the system and when they were first marked corrupt.

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]