From: Gavin (gavinvess.com)
Date: Tue Jun 01 2004 - 15:36:08 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Make up your mind: is it CDB or Berkeley DB?

Both. I expect the problem is independent of the table type, since the "postmap -fq" test cases work fine.

I tried using BDB hash tables first. Then I recompiled only with CDB support, and changed files appropriately. The result was the same in both tests. The rules in the check_client_access for smtpd_client_restrictions seem to be ignored when the MX record contains numerical data or the PTR is not verifiable.

Cheers,
Gavin

----- Original Message -----
From: <Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com>
To: "Postfix Users List" <postfix-userspostfix.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in smtpd_client_restrictions (rule skipped) or misconfiguration? Logs provided showing problem.

> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Gavin wrote:
>
> > % grep =samerica *
> > client_access.connect:200 REJECT =samerica
> > Binary file client_access.connect.cdb matches
> >
> > # postmap -fq 200 cdb:/etc/postfix/client_access.connect
> > REJECT =samerica
> >
> > smtpd_delay_reject = no
> >
> > smtpd_client_restrictions =
> > permit_mynetworks,
> > check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access.whitelist,
> > check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/client_access.cidr,
> > check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access.connect
> >
>
> Make up your mind: is it CDB or Berkeley DB?
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
> Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
> Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
>
> To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
> <mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]