From: John (jpozquickscribble.com)
Date: Tue Jun 01 2004 - 22:30:43 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Linux Journal just ran an article about a large-scale migration to postfix,
etc. It can be found in the following links:

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7323

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7524

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7456

We also just implemented a Dell CX-600 SAN for all of our Windows boxes.
It's fantastic. However, we found out (after purchase) that HP will not
support the connection from our N-Class HP-UX servers to the CX-600.
Apparently they only support connections to HP SANs (shocking!) and the EMC
Symetrix stuff (probably to other brands...don't know).

John

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cami" <camismweb.co.za>
To: <postfix-userspostfix.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: NFS Maildirs

> >1. Does any network storage platform come to mind as being
> > particularly fast (in terms of "postfix needs to write mails to
> > maildir, while clients hammer away using POP3 and IMAP) while being
> > reasonably economical?
> > We have an average of 13.000 Logins/h -- POP/IMAP
> > Note that the network storage is not exclusively used by us only,
> > but is being shared.
> >
> >
> > Do you have to share the filesystem or the NAS as such?
> >
> >
> >>2. Will any NFS solution scale? If not, what alternative is there?
>
> We have just moved to a Dell CX600, and its nothing short of amazing..
> Each machine/mailhost connects to the CX600 via Fibre channel network
> cards.. Its fast, very very fast..
>
> Cami
>

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]