|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: postgrey ????
From: Jarod Wilson (jcw
wilsonet.com)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 18:42:45 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday 01 July 2004 16:38, Noel Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:31:23PM -0700, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > > check_client_access dbm:/etc/postfix/pop-before-smtp,
> > > > reject_unauth_destination
> > > > check_policy_service = inet:127.0.0.1:10023,
> > >
> > > The last line "check_policy_service ..." must be indented!
> >
> > And for good measure, a comma after reject_unauth_destination.
>
> Nah. Commas are not required. Whitespace and/or commas may be used
> to separate restrictions. The command parser treats comma and
> whitespace the same.
> Some people may think it looks prettier with the commas, but postfix
> doesn't care either way.
I know. That's why I said "for good measure." ;-)
I actually suggested it, since the rest of the items in the list had commas,
and I figure either go all or nothing, not a mix. But yes, just a personal
preference/style thing.
--
Jarod C. Wilson, RHCE
jcw
wilsonet.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBA5KF5ln8CX+oYdJURAlnlAKDGYCVqUr/IKJOk00ikrzuvN70kuwCguPCI
vYa6PU7r7q0D7a1mNM9atEk=
=YTLi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]