From: Mike Partyka (mike.partykastonepath.com)
Date: Wed Sep 01 2004 - 16:33:26 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thanks, That was what I was looking for. As to the version of Postfix, it's
bundled with SuSE's Openexchange product and I think we'd be killing out
SuSE support if we did that, although I have wondered about how feasible it
would be.

Mike Partyka
Stonepath Logistics
Systems Administrator
(651)905-4372 Desk
(651)208-5734 Cell
(651)405-4342 Fax

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-postfix-userspostfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-userspostfix.org]On Behalf Of Magnus Bäck
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 3:47 PM
To: postfix-userspostfix.org
Subject: Re: acceptable parameters for debug_peer_list

On Wednesday, September 01, 2004 at 22:08 CEST,
     Mike Partyka <mike.partykastonepath.com> wrote:

> I browsed the archives on this but couldn't find the answer.
>
> Can someone tell me what valid formats that parameters for debug_peer_list
> can take? I know a domain name or IP address is acceptable but I'd like to
> get expanded logging on a particular user, can I just give it an email
> address?

The documentation tells you exactly what is acceptable, namely client
addresses, network blocks, and hostnames.

http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#debug_peer_list

> Secondly, not sure if the version affects the answer but we are running
> version 1.x

It's time to upgrade then.

--
Magnus Bäck
magnusdsek.lth.se

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]