From: Voytek (listssbt.net.au)
Date: Wed Sep 01 2004 - 18:45:08 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

<quote who="Alex van den Bogaerdt">
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:36:10PM +0000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> I noticed the other responses only after I answered.
> Not entirely sure but I think it is because of a weird date string
> in your post. You wrote your question 09:36 LT, not 09:36 UTC, right?
>
> [snip]
>> Received: from koala.sbt.net.au (koala.sbt.net.au [203.42.34.54])
>> by camomile.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5F1566C
>> for <postfix-userspostfix.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:36:15 -0400
>> (EDT)
>> Received: from smtp.sbt.net.au (dsl-97.54.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au
>> [220.240.54.97])
>> by koala.sbt.net.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 2760D238515
>> for <postfix-userspostfix.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:38:12 +1000
>> (EST)
>> To: postfix-userspostfix.org
>> X-Mailer: Post Road Mailer for OS/2 (Green Edition Ver 3.0)
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:36:10
>> From: Voytek Eymont <listssbt.net.au>
>> Reply-To: Voytek Eymont <listssbt.net.au>
> [snip]

Alex,

thanks for explanation (to the original Q)
also, thank you all for all the explanations on the original Q

yes, I've sent it about 21:36 local time (Sydney, Oz, AEST)

I think... my mail client (PostRoadMailer)? passes time is a not standard
? way

from my client mail log:
----
09/01/04 21:36:10 body-check false attachement reject To:
postfix-userspostfix.org
----

--
Voytek

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]