|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: anti-UCE efficacy of smtpd_helo_required
From: /dev/rob0 (rob0
gmx.co.uk)
Date: Fri Oct 01 2004 - 22:32:56 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Friday 01 October 2004 21:01, Rob Foehl wrote:
> > smtpd_helo_required? Or should I stop worrying and learn to love
> > the smtpd_helo_required?
>
> Just use it. It probably won't catch much spam, but it's even less
> likely to stop anything legitimate.
Advice from the loonybin! I'll take it. Thanks, Rob.
FWIW (re: anti-UCE) I've been watching, and sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org is
doing a fantastic job. Many thanks to the spamhaus and CBL and
Blitzed.org people. Still some spam is getting through, but the
customer is delighted with the improvement.
--
mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]