From: Tony Earnshaw (tonyebilly.demon.nl)
Date: Sun Oct 03 2004 - 07:50:47 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

søn, 03.10.2004 kl. 03.15 skrev Robin Lynn Frank:

> On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:49:23 +0200
> Lionel Bouton <lionel-subscriptionbouton.name> wrote:
>
> > Do gld users see benefits from using lightgrey ?
>
> If you receive a lot of mail from "server farms" with a bunch of MXes
> such as google's newsalerts, it can save time in whitelisting since they
> usually are in the same /24.

>From a fellow gld aficionado: also all hotmail and msn shit? Whitelist
(gld has no CIDR possibility at the moment) 65.54?

> However, when I encounter such a thing, I
> try to whitelist them all without resorting to lightgrey.
> Lightgreydomain dumbs things down too much and I likely will never use
> it. YMMV.

I agree!

--Tonni

--
«Livet er ein gamp», sa øyken.
I can confirm this.

mail: tonyebilly.demon.nl
http://www.billy.demon.nl

They love us, don't they, They feed us, won't they

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]