|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Postfix vulnerability
From: Tom Diehl (tdiehl
rogueind.com)
Date: Sun Feb 06 2005 - 23:42:03 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, John Madden wrote:
> > It would be nice if Linux distributors could indicate whether a
> > Postfix problem is part of the software base itself, or due to a
> > third-party add-on that they included with the base software.
>
> ...Sure would be nice if Linux vendors stopped wrecking a good thing by
> distributing non-standard components (attention: Redhat) with their
Although I will admit that the first rpm yanked from my Red Hat systems
is the postfix rpm I am courious what you call "non-standard components"
wrt to Red Hat's postfix rpm.
> distributions. At the very least, a simple re-branding (i.e., "Ubuntu
> Postfix") to make the distinction clear would be nice.
Regards,
Tom Diehl tdiehl
rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123
rogueind.com
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]