|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: reject on: Not supporting null originator (DSN), dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
From: /dev/rob0 (rob0
gmx.co.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2005 - 12:18:02 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 10:29, David Cary Hart wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 17:16 +0100, Piotr KUCHARSKI wrote:
> > In fact most (if not all) RBLs should be used for tagging, not
> > rejecting.
> >
> > PS header_if_reject rules, you should use it :->
>
> I would disagree. I don't use rfc-ignorant nor SPEWS. The FP rate
> from SORBS and Spamcop is virtually nonexistent. Using RBLs is
> simple, clean and low maintenance.
This matches with my experience, although I do throw
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org into the fray. No complaints of lost mail using
all of those RBL's.
On the contrary, I think it's silly to accept mail from known
Spamhausen. There is probably no legitimate mail coming from them.
--
mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]