From: Magnus Bäck (magnusdsek.lth.se)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 16:47:41 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tuesday, March 01, 2005 at 23:34 CET,
     "Covington, Chris" <ccovingtonplusone.com> wrote:

> >> Or do I need to do virtual for this?
> >
> >Yes.
>
> So I can't have both relay_domains set to example.com and a
> virtual_alias_maps file with userexample.com which expands to 2
> different addresses?

Sure you can (virtual aliasing applies to all recipients),
but the RHS of canoncial_maps is always one address.

> Instead I would have a virtual_alias_maps file with:
>
> userexample.com userexample.com
> user2example.com user2example.com
> user3example.com user3example.com
> user4example.com user4example.com
> user5example.com user6example.com, user7example.com
> user6example.com user6example.com
> user7example.com user7example.com
> .
> .
> .
>
> ? Would this still do recipient validation?

Assuming you keep the domain as a relay domain and keep
relay_recipient_maps it should work just fine, and you
don't even need the identity entries. Just add virtual
alias entries for the exceptional addresses (user5 in
this case).

--
Magnus Bäck
magnusdsek.lth.se

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]