|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [ot] mutt vs. GUI MUA (was: Re: rewrite reply-to)
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 11:44:12 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:23:08AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2005 09:25, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > Thunderbird is a very nice end-user MUA, I use it and AppleMail
> > myself, but only for personal email, not work or this list.
> > Postmasters use power-tools...
>
> Agreed, mutt is an indispensable piece of software, but MUA choice is a
> personal thing which must take into account the user's needs and ways
> of doing things. I actually switched away from using mutt as my main
> MUA some time ago.
>
Why I use "mutt" I am not a user, I am an a postmaster/list member.
When I am a user (personal email) I use Thunderbird or Apple Mail...
Don't misread my post, *postmasters* (and other power users) use
power-tools. I never said mutt is for end-users.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]