OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Re: [ot] mutt vs. GUI MUA (was: Re: rewrite reply-to)

From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 12:05:54 CST

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:56:59PM -0500, Covington, Chris wrote:

> > Not much choice on a box with no graphical ability.
>
> It's not that CLI is not end-user friendly, mutt isn't. Pine is a much
> more friendly command-line MUA. And you also have elm which is very
> similar to mutt. When I was a student at the University of Michigan
> (95-00) pine was your standard-issued, end-user MUA and it was CLI. I
> think most students are using webmail now, but U of M still supports
> pine.
>

FWIW, Wietse uses "X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)]".

I used to use Pine, until I found it just simply could not do some of
the more advanced message-processing I needed. Lets end the thread.

I still think that Adding "Reply-To:" headers is not a job for
header_checks and will eventually backfire.

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>