From: Matt Egan (gmail) (mbegangmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 05 2005 - 00:11:58 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Chris Wisecarver wrote:
[...]
>
> 02, 3485 ms
> Mar 24 16:22:10 cyclops amavis[7944]: (07944-02-6) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL [192.168.
> 254.242] [192.168.254.242] <immaaddress.com> -> <dgreenepheng.####.###>,
> Message-ID: <20050324222143.9391961AApheng.####.###>, Hits: 1.009, 2265 ms
> Mar 24 16:22:11 cyclops amavis[7938]: (07938-01-6) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL [192.168.
> 254.242] [192.168.254.242] <cwisecarverpheng.####.###> -> <bob####
> .###>, Message-ID: <20050324222143.B2C1A61BBpheng.####.###>, Hits: 1.022
> , 3288 ms
>
> Just so that this doesn't become a MailScanner lovefest... If I wanted a server that would drop all mail into a queue, say the hold queue. Then wait for mail to appear in the incoming queue and forward said mail to another server, how would I do that? Would I need two instances? One to queue and one to forward? Or could I do it in one? Is there some master.cf action that I would need?

where is the TIMING breakdown, what is eating up the most time? there is
nothing so inefficient about amavisd that you would see 15msgs/seconds
using the same ingredients (SA and CLAM) with mailscanner versus amavisd
at .3-1msgs/second, I have to think you have something wrong with your
amavisd setup.

I get much better results then that with a large sa ruleset doing surbl
lookups and running clamd and uvscan (command line). the box i'm running
it on is a dual p3 500 with 768 mb of ram. no screamer by any standards.

I haven't been watching the amavisd-new list much, if you decide to
follow up on amavisd preformance cc me and send to the amavisd list as
it has little/nothing to do with postfix.

-Matt

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]