|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: server performance
From: Tomas Ögren (stric
cs.umu.se)
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 02:57:01 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 31 May, 2005 - Beast wrote:
[..]
>>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>>>16438 spampd 17 0 40844 22m 2080 D 3.6 18.1 0:07.03 spampd
>>>16452 spampd 16 0 39612 23m 2092 S 3.0 19.0 0:05.22 spampd
>>>16425 spampd 16 0 40132 23m 2064 S 1.0 19.4 0:08.81 spampd
>>>16446 postfix 16 0 6484 1112 980 S 0.7 0.9 0:00.12 smtp
>
> Thanks for pointing out. I *really* think this new server has 1GB memory
> as per requirement before, my mistake...
>
> But at least this shows me how postfix perform on limited resources.
I'd rather say that it's spampd that eats it all up..
/Tomas
--
Tomas Ögren, stric
cs.umu.se, http://www.cs.umu.se/~stric/
`- Student and SysAdmin at Computing Science, University of Umeå
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]