|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: "HOLD" for customer email...clarification
From: Michael Nguyen (michaeln
twentyten.org)
Date: Sun Jan 29 2006 - 15:19:09 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: "mouss" <usebsd
free.fr>
> To: "Michael Nguyen" <michaeln
twentyten.org>
[snip]
> > I'm sorry Magnus, but I don't think I understand. What do you mean by
> > this? What scenario are you worried about?
>
> think of multi recipient mail.
I think I'm ok with this risk. It might turn out to be foolish, but I think
I've thought about it enough to where it'd be ok.
Last question. To implement this, should I put it as an
smtpd_recipient_restriction or an smtpd_data_restriction (so that the check
is run after the recipient has been accepted).
i.e.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/pastdue
vs.
smtpd_data_restrictions = check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/pastdue
Thanks guys.
[snip]
Michael
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]