From: Gerry (gerrymassat.net)
Date: Wed Feb 01 2006 - 18:28:06 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>Hi,
>
>> Oh yes, I always trust those messages, especially the ones comming from the administrator for my personal domain - the ones that say my account has been locked and I need to open the password protected attachment!!! ;-P
>> If Amavis doesn't offer this, you might want to look into something like altermime.
>
>Yep, I always look with more suspicion on stamped messages with
>attachments. That's typically virus laden messages. But that's me.
>
>We've got users who wouldn't know an x-header if it slapped them in
>the face.
>
>So I have to research this, because the users and my boss are
>breathing down my neck about this.
>
>Any way this can be done without making the system more complex
>than it already is? And how much would performance suffer from this
>(giving me arguments against using it, if necessary)?
>
>I'm using Postfix, SA, Amavis, Clamav.

Don't just blindly hit reply - pay attention to where the messages go, you'll get a better answer from the entire list than from me!!
Programs like outleek hide the headers so lusers can't use them.
It isn't good enought that all messages are automatically scanned? They want another silly disclaimer to be added to the bottom of all their emails? Can your mailstore automatically add your message like a signature?
Maybe the Amavis list might have an answer to adding a message to the body.

Notice: - this email has not been scanned for viruses. Minimum guaranteed sarcastic content of at least 95%. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, I don't care! :-)
 
                   

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]