From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com)
Date: Mon Feb 06 2006 - 07:48:41 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:19:55PM +1100, Joshua Goodall wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 02:20:26AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > You suggest that "postsuper -r" move mail to the incoming queue.
> > I repeat that this changes the TIME schedule only. It does not
> > change the PATH through the mail system. It therefore has no effect
> > on content inspection.
>
> That's exactly what I want - no change in the path through the
> mail system.
>
> Which isn't what we get with the pickup daemon's -o content_filter; this
> directly interferes with the path following postsuper -r <id>.
>

"postsuper -r" is for *re-queueing* mail, fixing broken content filter
specifications, ... It is not a replacement for a per-message flush
primitive. I have built a "postsuper -f qid" patch for that. It is not
yet ready for prime-time, it is not yet clear that the implementation
(sticky bit on queue files) or interface (postsuper -f) are right.

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]