|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: 2.3 and Dovecot SASL
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Fri Apr 28 2006 - 12:08:40 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:49:38PM -0400, David Cary Hart wrote:
> I hate to fix what ain't broke. SASL works just fine.
>
> Are there performance and security benefits to implementing Dovecot
> SASL support?
>
If you are using Dovecot as your IMAP server, fewer things to tinker
with, but using its auth engine for both IMAP and SMTP.
Note that not all mechanisms can be proxied in this manner. I doubt
that GSSAPI would work (not that Postfix really supports GSSAPI
anyway, there is not yet support in Postfix for SASL security
layers i.e. encryption via SASL rather than TLS, and GSSAPI usually
encrypts and authenticates).
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
system/email administrator to architect and sustain the Unix email
environment. If you are interested, please drop me a note.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]