|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: usage of domain keys
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2006 - 17:13:41 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 02:53:31PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:36:27PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> >...
> >how is your experience about domain keys, can anybody tell a little bit
> >how much spam would it stop ....
>
> I've not used it, but a colleague who has some involvement in the
> process of drafting the spec informed me (when I showed him your note):
>
> * Domain Keys is not designed to stop spam.
>
> * It may help stop "phishing" attacks.
Not alone, it is merely a foundation on which new MUA and gateway
features will be built that should facilitate distinguishing some
fraudulent mail from the real thing.
> * Under certain specialized situations, it *may* assist with
> "whitelisting" certain sources of email.
This is the primary feature today.
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
system/email administrator to architect and sustain the Unix email
environment. If you are interested, please drop me a note.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]