OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Re: New mail servers - SCSI vs SATA?

From: Andrzej Kukuła (akukulagmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 24 2006 - 02:12:26 CDT


On 6/24/06, Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandtcharite.de> wrote:
> * Joshua J. Kugler <joshuaeeinternet.com>:
> > On Friday 23 June 2006 14:09, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > > * Joshua J. Kugler <joshuaeeinternet.com>:
> > > > line of drives, namely the WD RE2 line. 1.2 hours MTBF at 100% duty
> > > > cycle
> > >
> > > 1.2 hours MTBF sounds like a lot of drive swapping work if you ask me.
> >
> > Wow...i need to proof read. Yeah, 1.2 hours would be a pain. That *should*
> > have been 1.2 million hours MTBF (i.e. 136.9 years). That sound better? :)
>
> Yep.
>
> For he record: We're using ATA drives exclusively (in RAID boxes which give us SCSI
> connectors), which gives us good reliability at a relatively low price.

I have Infortrend box with 12*250GB SATA disks, the box has SCSI320
interface, on the server side it's LSI ULTRA320 on PCI-X and it gives
me 280 MB/s peak throughput what is pretty satisfying ;)

Regards,
Andrzej Kukula