From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2006 - 15:00:11 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:45:40PM -0400, David Cary Hart wrote:

> In spite of my vigorous efforts to break things, dovecot-1.0.rc2
> works just fine for SASL authentication. The instructions in the
> README are perfect including the text for dovecot.conf.
>
> Thanks Wietse, Victor et al

The SASL work is not mine, but if you try to break the new TLS code
especially by using Outlook against the 2.3 server, I am eager for
feedback. My current guess is that Outlook may be unhappy when the server
does not offer a session ID, this would be an Outlook bug, session IDs
are not required. For example the postini.com MX hosts return no TLS
session IDs (these are not Postfix).

--
        Viktor.

P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
     system/email administrator to architect and sustain the Unix email
     environment. If you are interested, please drop me a note.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]