|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Postmaster and abuse default in virtual_alias_map
From: Alain NAKACHE (alain
alinto.net)
Date: Sun Jul 30 2006 - 09:41:04 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
> On Sunday, July 30, 2006 at 08:00 CEST,
> Alain NAKACHE <alain
alinto.net> wrote:
>
>
>> 1/ Are tables in a virtual_alias_maps red sequentially, i.e. first
>> ldap table and if not found an alias then hash table in my config ?
>> Where in documentation can I find such explanation ?
>>
>
> Don't know where it's documented, but for each lookup key according to
> virtual(5) the maps specified in virtual_alias_maps are looked up in
> order.
>
> for each key K in virtual(5)
> for each map M in virtual_alias_maps
> look up K in M, terminate upon match
>
>
Good. But as Wietse used to say features not documented ... :-)
>> 2/ Is the syntax 'postmaster
' can match any alias which user part is
>> 'posmaster' and so on. Do I have to use regexp table ? Where in the
>> documentation can I find sequences of tests made on tables ?
>>
>
> virtual(5) documents the lookups made against virtual alias tables,
> alias(5) local alias tables, generic(5) generic maps, and access(5)
> access tables. Otherwise see postconf(5).
>
>
Then pce_table(5) is my only chance to achieve my goal since
'postmaster
' is not in the search order. Right ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]