|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: transports and wildcard
From: Magnus Bäck (magnus
dsek.lth.se)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2006 - 08:49:38 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday, August 02, 2006 at 15:20 CEST,
"Coffey, Neal" <ncoffey
langeveld.com> wrote:
[...]
> That said, I can't find much information about the relay transport in
> the docs. The page on transports has a link for smtp, local, and
> virtual but not relay. So, looking at my master.cf, plus the
> bottleneck analysis page and a little intuition that it's just an
> SMTP process, so I'm assuming that the main benefits are:
>
> * Doesn't take away from the incoming SMTP process limits
> * Can be tuned seperately
Correct.
> Are there any inherent benefits in (or differences with) using the
> relay transport, even if no hand-tuning is done? And where do I
> look for the documentation on this? :) (I'm on version 2.3.1.)
Unless I'm mixing up the "new" qmgr(8) (default since Postfix 2.1)
with the old one (now available as oqmgr(8)), the advantage of having
a separate transport for inbound messages is that the queue manager
schedules messages not only to give fairness with regard to each
destination but also with regard to each transport.
I don't think the scheduling algorithm is documented in detail anywhere.
I did not find a description of the preemption rules used in the new
qmgr.
--
Magnus Bäck
magnus
dsek.lth.se
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]