|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Large incoming que
From: Adrian Ulrich (pfix
blinkenlights.ch)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2006 - 11:38:58 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
> Have used iostat and I see lots of small transactions.
It's a Mailserver afterall ;-)
> What do you mean by "svctm/%util"?
Service-Time + Percent-Busy
I don't have access to a FreeBSD-Host ATM, but the output of solaris
iostat -xnz 5 looks like this: (Output on FreeBSD should be similar):
r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
20.6 8.9 1281.1 53.1 1.8 0.3 62.1 11.2 9 21 c0d0
If %b(usy) is above ~>70% you are having speed-issues with your
storage system.
> Ideally I would like to decrease incoming mails only to these two machines.
> Other machines are fine.
Limit the number of smtpd processes (= Incoming mail) on this two hosts
> I am still trying to
> convince the powers that be.. to get a SCSI setup for these domains.
How about a 'shared storage' for all 4 Backends?
<ADV>
I'm a very happy NetApp(.com) customer: We are using a bunch
of FAS270 Boxes for Mailqueues and never had any (Storage-Related)
speed issues. They can do NFS, FCP, iSCSI (urgs) provide Raid4 and
Raid4-DP (Think 'raid6' -> Double Parity) you can create
Snapshots (without any performance issues unlike
${everyone_else's_solution}) .. etc..
</ADV>
> > You are using Maildir, correct?
> Correct. Maildir run off Courier IMAP, serving imap and pop3.
So switching to Dovecot might help: IMAP with dovecot seems to be
pretty fast.
Regards,
Adrian
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]