|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Sender Verification Doc
From: David Cary Hart (PostfixMTA
TQMcube.com)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2006 - 21:18:52 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think that SV is a terrible idea to begin with. I will
spare you the rant. Nevertheless:
"By default, Postfix probe messages have
postmaster
$myorigin" as the sender address. This is SAFE
because the Postfix SMTP server does not reject mail for this
address."
That doesn't make sense to me. Doesn't that presuppose that the
probed server is running Postfix or am I suffering from a senior
moment? The concept makes sense - just not the explanation.
"You can change this into the null address
("address_verify_sender ="). This is UNSAFE because address
probes will fail with mis-configured sites that reject MAIL
FROM: <>, while probes from 'postmaster
$myorigin' would
succeed."
While I agree, that's not limited to mis-configured servers.
Rejecting null sender seems to be the most effective means of
eliminating backscatter. Is that an errant conclusion on my part?
--
Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam at the Source: http://www.TQMcube.com
Don't Subsidize Criminals: http://boulderpledge.org
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]