|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Bounce on ok?
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Sat Dec 02 2006 - 11:05:26 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Arnold Hendriks wrote:
> Nov 16 17:59:26 btc1 postfix/qmgr[6116]: 397D826463:
> from=<p.vanderscheer (AT) b-lex.com>, size=2843, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
> Nov 16 18:00:46 btc1 postfix/smtp[22327]: 397D826463:
> to=<a.hendriks (AT) b-lex.com>, relay=mx1.b-lex.com[217.119.224.164],
> delay=80, status=bounced (host mx1.b-lex.com[217.119.224.164] said:
> 250 Ok (in reply to DATA command))
The server [217.119.224.164] responded with a 250 Ok to the "DATA"
command, when the only valid responses are 354, 4XX or 5XX. There is
undoubtedly an SMTP busting firewall between the client and the server.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]