From: Arnold Hendriks (a.hendriksb-lex.nl)
Date: Sun Dec 03 2006 - 06:49:37 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

First, my apologies for the Dutch email to the mailinglist earlier, I
overlooked the Reply-To back to the mailinglist. To summarize that post,
the problem hasn't reappeared after I restarted both involved postfixes.

Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:28:11PM +0100, Arnold Hendriks wrote:
>
>> Nov 16 17:59:26 btc1 postfix/qmgr[6116]: 397D826463:
>> from=<p.vanderscheer (AT) b-lex.com>, size=2843, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
>> Nov 16 18:00:46 btc1 postfix/smtp[22327]: 397D826463:
>> to=<a.hendriks (AT) b-lex.com>, relay=mx1.b-lex.com[217.119.224.164],
>> delay=80, status=bounced (host mx1.b-lex.com[217.119.224.164] said:
>> 250 Ok (in reply to DATA command))
>>
>
> The server [217.119.224.164] responded with a 250 Ok to the "DATA"
> command, when the only valid responses are 354, 4XX or 5XX. There is
> undoubtedly an SMTP busting firewall between the client and the server.
>
There shouldn't be, both 217.119.224.163 and .164 are directly connected
to an external interface (two separate wall sockets, no local switch)
and to the best of my knowledge, the other end is a switch connected to
a router. But I will check with the ISP to make absolutely sure nothing
funny is happening on that side.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]