From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com)
Date: Sun Jan 28 2007 - 11:30:37 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:20:36PM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:

> I just found this on the Mailscanner forum:
>
> //quote//
>
> Support for the 'p' records in Postfix 2.3/2.4 will have to wait for the
> next release of MailScanner, personally I think it is a nasty bodge. I
> wouldn't be at all surprised if Weitse changed his mind on this topic,
> he certainly should do.
>
> Julian Field MEng CITP
> www.MailScanner.info
>
> //end quote//
>
> Exactly what is this referring to?

He is referring to his mis-use of the non-public, undocumented Postfix
queue file format and plans to keep track of changes in this format
rather than abandon its use.

Mailscanner attempts to implement a fast-path for messages that are not
modified by the content scanner. It cuts too many corners to achieve
this goal.

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]