|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [OT] dnsbl.sorbs.net too much restrictive ?
From: Erwan David (erwan
rail.eu.org)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2007 - 06:40:29 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le Thu 22/02/2007, David Hart disait
> On Thu 2007-02-22 11:50:11 +0100 Erwan David wrote:
> > Le Thu 22/02/2007, Robert Felber disait
> > >
> > > 1) personally I suggest to exlcude PBL because you hand the decison whether
> > > to accept dynamic clients (such real clients exist) to spamhaus the ISP of the
> > > client in question. PBL may be included in scoring systems, though.
> > > PBL stands for Policy Blocking List, more info http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/
> >
> > And PBL lists many BIG blocks (a friend of mine found a /11 in it...)
> > which is not reasonable.
>
> What has the size of the block got to do with whether it's reasonable or
> not? All that matters is that the block does in fact meet the
> conditions as described at http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/.
>
> Did your friend find any addresses within that /11 range that should not
> have been blocked?
Yes, many.
--
Erwan
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]