|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Noel Jones (njones
megan.vbhcs.org)
Date: Tue Mar 06 2007 - 14:38:55 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 02:05 PM 3/6/2007, jacusy wrote:
>Noel Jones schrieb:
> >
> >
> > jacusy might instead set "soft_bounce = yes" temporarily while testing
> > this feature and watch the logs for rejects of valid addresses.
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#soft_bounce
> >
>If I would set soft_bounce to yes, what would happen to an invalid mail?
>I guess the sender gets a bounce, and that means what, that the sender
>trys sending the message later again?
>
>I would prefer the virtual table solution, although I have to rewrite my
>script and change the configuration in another way :-/
With soft_bounce = yes, postfix will 450 defer any mail that would
otherwise be rejected. The sending system won't generate a bounce
for whatever it's equivalent $maximal_queue_lifetime setting.
This is intended as a "test" setting that lets you see what would be
rejected without actually rejecting anything. (The invalid addresses
won't be accepted, but the sending system should try again later.)
Your call, do whichever seems better for you.
--
Noel Jones
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]