|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni
MorganStanley.com)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 11:41:05 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 01:56:16PM +0000, Duane Hill wrote:
> I'm going to strip everything out of the policy and just have it pass
> everything through with a 'dunno' for now and see if errors occur. I'm
> now suspecting possibly something within the script is causing the error.
> I do in fact see SQL records being added and updated. So I know at least
> it is working some of the time.
This makes no sense, "connection refused" is not an aplication-level
response, it is a kernel system-call response, when there is no listener
on the socket in question. You don't get connection refused when the
listener is busy, slow, ... Since it appears you are running the service
under "master" and master does not periodically close service sockets
without a "reload" being issued in which the service is found missing
from master.cf, you still don't have a consisten set of evidence...
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo
postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]