|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Jorey Bump (list
joreybump.com)
Date: Tue Jun 26 2007 - 11:08:14 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joey wrote:
> I agree, however in watching results it seems to be doing a great job of
> nailing the spam. I can tell by the address the message
> Is being sent to. So far no false positives and a decent number of blocks.
> It's only been in place a day, but I'm very optimistic.
You might want to monitor this without actually deferring messages,
until you are quite sure there are no false positives (one day is not
long enough to form a conclusion).
> Also if someone calls in with a bounce we can easily whitelist and move
> forward.
By that time the message may have been deferred for an unacceptably long
time. Also, consider that for every single bounce you hear about, there
may be multiple ones you don't. This is an inherent pitfall in any
system that relies on whitelisting.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]