From: Victor Duchovni (Victor.DuchovniMorganStanley.com)
Date: Fri Aug 31 2007 - 15:59:56 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:42:09PM +0100, K. C. Li wrote:

> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Jay Chandler wrote:
>
> > Uncomment the lines about submission in master.cf-- that'll allow SASL
> > authentication to the submission port, traditionally 587. You might
> > also want to read up on configuring SASL...
>
> Thank you, Jay and Andreas! The alternative port is working fine now. We
> have to go higher than 1024 as 587 appears to be blocked by some ISPs too.

I don't think that is a good idea, use the standard submission port. ISPs
have no reason to block 587, and if a small number do that (which ones?),
they will soon learn the error of their ways? Gmail uses 587, you can
probably do likewise.

--
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomopostfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]