From: Charles Marcus (CMarcusMedia-Brokers.com)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2007 - 12:31:58 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 9/20/2007, Jay Chandler (listssequestered.net) wrote:
> As Victor's said, 587 is the way to go. A network that blocks
> outgoing 587 is either a high security corporate site, or the sign of
> an admin in desperate need of a clue with regard to what he's doing...

I'm assuming you meant 'incoming'? ;) Although I'd agree that it
wouldn't be very useful to block outgoing port 587 either, unless you
simply wanted to prevent anyone from using an outside smtp server, which
certainly some corporate networks might have good reason to do.

--

Best regards,

Charles

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]